In this lab we'll look at what its like to add bromine to transcinamic acid via adding methods of stereo-chemistry. Additionally we'll take a look at trying to prove the reaction was successful and that we actually did get 2,3-dibromo-3-pheylpropanoic acid.Bromination are a type of Halogenation procedures using bromine, read more about it here.
But first a distraction: Right now there an offer where you can get a dollar (US) sent to your place of residence. The instructions go as follows....
1) sign up at this website.
2) Confirm your email.
3) Go to prizes sections. Specifically the low cost rewards.
4) Order Dollar.
5) Wait
6)Receive and enjoy!
When you sign up they'll give you 250 free points. Which is convenient because the dollar is 100 points and shipping is 144. Aka you get a free dollar. Enjoy!
Below is kind of a generalized look at the addition of the Bromine via a Trans Addition, which sorry to spoil the surprise is the way its going to add.
Trans-cinnamic acid (E-3-phenyl-2-propanoic acid) has a molecular weight of 148 g/mol and a melting point of 133 degrees Celsius.
There are several enantiomers of 2,3-dibromo-3-phenylpropanoic acid, they all have a molecular weight of 308 g/mol (Molecular Weight: 307.96662 to be specific).
The (2R, 3S) and (2S, 3R) have a melting point of 202-204 degrees Celsius.
The (2R, 3R) and (2S, 3S) have a melting point of 93.5 to 95 degrees Celsius.
Things that were done:
150 mg trans-cinnamic acid and .6 mL glacial acetic acid were put acid in a test tube. The tube was put in a 50 degree celcius water bath till all the trans-cinnamic acid dissolves. Next 1.0mL of 1.0M Br2 in acetic solution. the mix was stirred via agitation at 50 degrees Celsius till the color faded from red/brown to light orange and was heated for another 15 minutes. Next a drop of cyclohexane was added. The mix was cooled in ice water bath for 10 minutes (crystals formed). Meanwhile distilled water was cooled (in an ice bath). Note if the crystal didn't form the side would have been scratched with a siring rod and left in the ice water bath for another ten minutes.
The product was collected via vacuum filtration. The crystals were washed with ice water ( note its a good idea to do it till the smell of acetic acid is gone. Next was the process of recrystallization. The sample retrieved from vacuum filtration was placed in .5mL ethanol in an 10mL Erlenmeyer flask. After the sample had dissolved boiling stick was added and the mix was heated via a steam water bath. If the sample doesn't dissolve add more ethanol. Next a volume of water equal to the amount of ethanol was added. The sample was removed from the heat and allowed to cool for 10 minutes in ice. Crystals were removed from the solution via vacuum filtration (note a new clean Hirsch funnel and new filter paper was used)
Things you may ask...
What is a mixed solvent recrystallization? What is the reason for using mixed solvent recrystallization?
Mixed solvent recrystalization refers to a process of crystallization used for the purpose of purification. A solvent is added to a mixture with desired and undesired components creating a solution. The solution is heated so that all of its components are able to dissolve, this solvent chosen because of its known properties of solubility. At a higher temperature everything should remain dissolved in the solvent as it becomes supersaturated. However as it cools crystals of your desired compound should form being that at lower temperatures the solvent can no longer remain super saturated, meanwhile impurities and undesired compounds should remain dissolved in the solvent. In this experiment the crystals could be isolated via vacuum filtration.
Should the product exhibit optical activity?
No the product would not exhibit optical activity because while each enantiomer is chiral they exist as a racemic mixture such that the specific rotation of one enantionmer would cancel the rotation of the other being that they should have the same magnitude but in the opposite direction.
What is the mechanism of the addition like?
It can happen via Radicals
If the observed melting point or range is near
the reported melting range from the literature it suggests that the product is that of the
enantiomer set. For this particular experiment the (2R,3S) and (2S,
3R) enantiomers of 2,3-dibromo-3-phenylproanoic acid are expected. Indicating that the bromine addition occurred via
an anti method. Had bromine of added via syn addition the melting point would
have been near 95 °C (provided in the literature). The difference of several degrees
between the literature and the experimental values may be the result of
impurities and the possible existence of other enantiomers or compounds in the
product. Recall that impurities cause depression and extend the range of the melting points.
"There are several enantioinmers of 2,3-dibromo-3-phenylpropanoic acid, they all have a molecular weight of 208 g/mol". This is incorrect, they are 308 g/mol.
ReplyDeleteThanks for finding that! I will update to reflect the error.
ReplyDeletethanks, this is really helpful to me.
ReplyDeletethis was so helpful. keep it up
ReplyDeleteSimply wish to say your article is as astonishing. The clarity in your post is simply great, and I could assume you are an expert on this subject. Same as your blog i found another one Sohman Epoxy .Actually I was looking for the same information on internet for
ReplyDeletePolyetheramine and came across your blog. I am impressed by the information that you have on this blog. Thanks a million and please keep up the gratifying work.
What would the possible impurities be?
ReplyDelete